Why Open Core has a problem and is not a problem.

Pamela Jones, of Groklaw, thinks that OSI has a problem in Open Core. I think she has it backwards. The Open Core (most notably SugarCRM) folks have a problem. They'd like to convince people that they can achieve the open source effect by having two versions of their code: an open source version, and a proprietary version. They'd like to convince people that their proprietary code is going to benefit from the open source effect. Good luck with that! The open source effect is an integral part of having code distributed under an OSI-approved license. You can't slice and dice it like you can with property rights, having surface rights, mineral rights, water rights, etc. Not open source? No open source effect for you!

The more they differentiate their proprietary version from the open source version, the more obvious it becomes that the open source effect isn't contributing to the proprietary version. The less they differentiate it, the less reason to buy the proprietary version. This is a narrow plank to walk. If the Open Core folks can figure out how to stay on the tightrope, and make lots of money, hey great! Good for them! They're not going to be a success by trying to sell their proprietary version as if it was open source, though. That dog don't hunt.


I have written of one example in my own project space of FOSS ERP (rather than start flames with other projects i am not working around) which is OpenBravo. Here is my blog article: http://red1empire.blogspot.com/2008/10/openbravo-unethical-use-of-compieres.html I like to add that Open Core exist due to the mistaken idea that money can be made fast and easy by riding on FOSS in a commercial manner thus giving rise to the dichotomy of Community Open Source vs Commercial Open Source but i say that the war is going one way as i explained here in another blog article http://red1empire.blogspot.com/2008/10/open-source-war.html Kind Regards Redhuan D. Oon (core activist of ADempiere fork from Compiere)

In replying to my own project forum here http://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/610546/topic/4402204/index/page/1 and offering my own rant on how i see Open Core is a marketing lie: http://red1.org/adempiere/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=1156. IMHO we need to reestablish the original GPL spirit.

To promote and protect open source software and communities...

For over 20 years the Open Source Initiative (OSI) has worked to raise awareness and adoption of open source software, and build bridges between open source communities of practice. As a global non-profit, the OSI champions software freedom in society through education, collaboration, and infrastructure, stewarding the Open Source Definition (OSD), and preventing abuse of the ideals and ethos inherent to the open source movement.

Open source software is made by many people and distributed under an OSD-compliant license which grants all the rights to use, study, change, and share the software in modified and unmodified form. Software freedom is essential to enabling community development of open source software.