Quorum reached and meeting called to order at 16:04 UTC.
None.
Expected, but Not PresentThe Board reviewed the minutes of the December meeting. Mr. Tiemann moved that the Board approve the minutes. Ms. Sharma seconded. Minutes approved by general consent.
No report submitted.
Mr. Michlmayr reports:
Ms. Sharma gave an update on the current bank balances. She has an updated treasurer's report which she will send to the board list in the near future.
Ms. Sharma reported that she had spent some time last month to ensure that all outstanding expense reports are paid. Mr. Phipps confirmed that he had received his reimbursement.
The accountant has started working on taxes for 2011. All Director's should make sure that their addresses in the internal wiki are up-to-date.
Mr. Phipps requested travel support from OSI to attend FOSDEM where he will give a keynote speech about the new governance structure of the OSI. Mr. Phipps requested reimbursement of 192 GBP. Mr. Tiemann moved that the OSI would reimburse Mr. Phipps' travel expenses to FOSDEM up to this amount. Ms. Sharma seconded. Motion approved by general consent.
No report submitted.
Mr. Tiemann summarized his activities to ensure that the open hardware group respects our logo rights. He noted that they are not at risk of creating a trademark issue for us at this time. They have not formed an organization yet but that they might be a potential affiliate in the future.
(Listed in alphabetical order)
Mr. Kon reported that work on the educational material portal is slowly moving forward.
Mr. Wasserman noted that he is working on an outline of a Body of Knowledge of open source. He suggested to obtain a separate domain and setup a wiki or similar system where people can add content. After some discussion, we agreed that it should be done on opensource.org or a sub-domain since opensource.org is a very popular domain and because we have a lot of infrastructure in place already. Mr. Wasserman agreed to send a message to the Infrastructure Committee outlining his requirements for the site.
Mr. Fogel reports:
No report submitted.
Mr. Phipps gave an update on the affiliate scheme and noted that things are going well. A mailing list has been established with the current affiliates and some board members.
Mr. Phipps noted that we have several independent organizations as affiliates now and that it's therefore a good time to make an announcement. He has secured a keynote slot at FOSDEM in early February where he intends to announce the affiliate scheme and possibly pre-announce the personal membership scheme.
Mr. Wasserman suggested that FOSDEM would be a great venue to poll members of the community on what they'd like to see in the personal membership scheme. He volunteered to work on a draft survey. Ms. Sharma suggested weekly meetings to ensure that things are in place for FOSDEM.
Mr. Phipps also remarked that we have to start discussing the draft affiliate agreement with the affiliates. Mr. Jagielski agreed to work on the affiliate agreement a few weeks ago but it's not clear what the status is.
No report submitted.
Administrative CommitteesMr. Phipps would like to post a blog entry about the MPLv2 to opensource.org. He's also working on the keynote for FOSDEM.
Mr. Fogel reported that he set up an SVN repository on projects.opensource.org for shared secrets, but would like to upgrade to SparkleShare or GitDocs as those will be easier to use and no less secure. However, there is no reason not to start storing the stuff in the SVN repository now. Regarding domain assets: have started a conversation about transfering them to formal OSI ownership.
No report submitted.
Chicago and Chapel Hill have been proposed as possible venues and it seems that there's a preference for Chicago.
The board looked at the Doodle pool that had been started to capture the availability of all board members and concluded that the best option is to hold the meeting in Chicago on the weekend of May 19-20.
Holding the meeting in May will also allow the newly elected board members to join the meeting. The plan regarding the election is to start discussing the process for the election at the next meeting (on February 1st). In particular, the number of seats (2-3), recommendations from affiliate organizations and the process will be discussed in the February and March board meetings, culminating in an election in early April.
None.
The next OSI BOD meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 1, 2012.
Meeting adjourned at 17:22 UTC.